Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a portion of the agreed sale consideration received on transfer of shares could be recharacterised as income from other sources on the footing that a related purchase commitment enhanced the share value.
Analysis: The assessee transferred shares of an Indian company to an unrelated purchaser at an agreed per-share price, while an affiliate of the assessee group had given a commercial purchase commitment to support the purchaser's confidence in future business. The record did not show that the share sale was a sham, colourable device, or make-believe arrangement. The services underlying the purchase commitment were genuine, the commitment was honoured, and the actual purchases exceeded the committed volumes. All sellers transferred at the same price per share, yet the revenue selectively recharacterised part of the assessee's receipt without any specific statutory basis. In the absence of a provision authorising such bifurcation, the agreed consideration for transfer of a capital asset could not be rewritten or split on conjectures about valuation.
Conclusion: The portion of the share sale consideration attributed by the revenue to the purchase commitment could not be assessed as income from other sources, and the addition was unsustainable.