Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of the difference between the purchase consideration of an immovable property and its stamp duty value could be sustained when the variation was within the permissible tolerance band.
Analysis: The difference between the agreement value and the stamp duty value was approximately 7.41%, which fell within the 10% tolerance band recognised by the legislature in comparable provisions relating to immovable property transactions. The Tribunal applied a harmonious construction of sections 50C, 43CA and 56(2)(x) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and followed the view that the benefit of the tolerance band is available even for section 56(2)(vii)(b). The deeming fiction for substitution of stamp duty value was held not to operate where the variation remained within the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) was unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the difference between the declared consideration and the stamp duty value of immovable property falls within the prescribed tolerance limit, the deeming provision cannot be invoked to tax the marginal variation.