TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee's application under Rule 27 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 was maintainable to challenge the estimation of income without rejection of books of account; (ii) Whether the Assessing Officer could estimate income by applying a percentage on turnover without first rejecting the books of account, and whether the resultant addition could survive.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee's application under Rule 27 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 was maintainable to challenge the estimation of income without rejection of books of account.
Analysis: The assessee raised a legal objection that the assessment was framed on estimation while the books of account had not been rejected. The objection was treated as a permissible ground under Rule 27 because it went to the legality of the assessment and could be urged even without a separate appeal by the assessee on that point.
Conclusion: The Rule 27 application was maintainable and was allowed.
Issue (ii): Whether the Assessing Officer could estimate income by applying a percentage on turnover without first rejecting the books of account, and whether the resultant addition could survive.
Analysis: The income was estimated at 8% of turnover despite only partial compliance by the assessee, but no rejection of the books of account was recorded. The governing principle applied was that estimation of income is permissible only after the books are rejected and a finding is recorded that they do not correctly reflect the true state of affairs. Since the books were not rejected, the addition based on estimation could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The estimation made by the Assessing Officer was unsustainable and the addition was directed to be deleted.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the legal challenge to estimation, the revenue's grievance against deletion did not survive, and the appeal was disposed of against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Income can be estimated only after the books of account are rejected on recorded grounds showing that they do not reflect the true state of affairs.
TaxTMI 
