Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid for want of approval from the competent authority under section 151, and whether the consequential assessment order could survive.
Analysis: The reassessment notice was issued after more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, attracting the requirement of prior sanction from the authority specified in section 151(ii). The approval had been obtained from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or other competent authority prescribed by law. In light of the binding principle that the prescribed sanction is a mandatory procedural safeguard before issuance of a notice under section 148, the reassessment action suffered from non-compliance with section 151.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was held to be bad in law and invalid, and the consequential assessment order was quashed.