Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand confirmed by including the value of rails supplied free of cost by Indian Railways in the assessable value of glued joints could be sustained in view of the retrospective exemption introduced by Entry No. 205A in Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. through the Finance Act, 2015.
Analysis: The demand had been confirmed on the footing that, during the relevant period, no exemption existed for exclusion of the value of free-supplied rails. The subsequent insertion of Entry No. 205A in Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. by the Finance Act, 2015 granted retrospective exemption for the very period in dispute, namely 17.03.2012 to 03.02.2014. Once the amendment was made retrospective, the legal basis of the original adjudication required reconsideration in the light of the amended position. Since the adjudicating authority had no occasion to examine eligibility under the retrospective exemption, fresh adjudication was necessary.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained on the existing basis and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with the retrospective exemption.