GST refund withholding requires pending proceedings and recorded reasons; mere time to appeal cannot justify deferral.

Refund under GST can be withheld only when the refund-generating order is already under appeal or another pending proceeding, and only if the Commissioner records the statutory satisfaction that refund may prejudice revenue due to malfeasance or fraud. Rule 92(2) also requires a speaking order in Form GST RFD-07 with recorded reasons. A mere possibility that the State may file an appeal, or the existence of time to do so, is not enough to defer refund consideration. An order refusing to consider the refund application on that basis was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with fresh consideration directed in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund arising from an appellate order could be withheld or the refund application refused merely because the State still had time to file an appeal, in the absence of any pending appeal or other proceeding, and whether the authority could invoke the power to withhold refund without recording the statutory reasons and satisfaction required by the GST framework.

Analysis: The statutory scheme permits withholding of refund only where the order giving rise to refund is already the subject matter of an appeal or other pending proceeding and the Commissioner forms the requisite opinion that grant of refund may adversely affect revenue on account of malfeasance or fraud. Rule 92(2) further requires an order in Form GST RFD-07 with recorded reasons. Mere contemplation of a future appeal, or the existence of time to file one, does not satisfy these jurisdictional prerequisites. The impugned order proceeded on the premise that refund could be deferred until the State's appeal period expired, without showing that any appeal or proceeding was pending on the date of the order and without addressing the mandatory statutory safeguards. Such an approach amounted to ignoring the operative appellate order and exercising a power not yet triggered by the statute.

Conclusion: The refusal to consider the refund application was unsustainable, and the order withholding consideration of refund was set aside. The matter was remitted to the authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: The power to withhold refund under the GST law arises only when the refund order is already under an appeal or pending proceeding and the statutory opinion and reasons are recorded; a mere possibility or contemplation of appeal is insufficient.

---