Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on the refunded seized cash under Section 132B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the Court could award compensatory interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India despite the absence of assessment proceedings and the pendency of vigilance reference proceedings.
Analysis: The seized cash of Rs. 9,00,000 was returned to the petitioner, but no interest was paid. Section 132B(4)(a) provides for simple interest at the rate of one-half per cent for every month or part of a month, and Section 132B(4)(b) stipulates that such interest runs from the expiry of 120 days from the execution of the last authorisation under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A until completion of assessment, reassessment, or recomputation. As no assessment was undertaken, the statutory objection that no interest was payable was rejected. The pendency of a reference to vigilance authorities was held not to justify further withholding of interest. The Court also held that, where refund is delayed because no assessment is made, its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked to award compensatory interest.
Conclusion: Interest at the rate of one-half per cent per month, equivalent to 6% per annum, was held payable on the refunded amount from the expiry of 120 days from 01.05.2019 until 05.06.2026, with further interest at 12% per annum in case of non-payment within the time granted.