Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was payable on the quantity of metallurgical coke cleared from the factory or only on the quantity actually exported as reflected in the shipping bills.
Analysis: Rule 18 links rebate to goods exported after payment of duty and the notification issued under that rule prescribes the conditions and procedure for rebate. The Court held that the operative basis for rebate is the quantity actually exported out of India, not the quantity originally cleared from the factory or warehouse. On the admitted facts, the quantity shipped was lower than the quantity dispatched, and no moisture content was declared at the time of removal or duty payment to justify the differential. The authorities, therefore, correctly restricted rebate to the exported quantity shown in the shipping bills.
Conclusion: Rebate was correctly limited to the quantity actually exported, and the challenge to the impugned orders failed.