Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a charge created by the tax authority over mortgaged property could be quashed in view of the secured creditor's priority under Section 31B of the Securitization Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Analysis: The secured creditor had already created and uploaded the mortgage particulars in the CERSAI portal. Section 31B gives priority to the secured interest over government tax dues, so the secured creditor may proceed against the property notwithstanding the charge. At the same time, the existence of that priority did not justify deleting or quashing the tax charge at that stage, because any surplus after the secured debt is satisfied may still be available for adjustment towards the tax dues, and the Sub-Registrar can note the eventual SARFAESI sale by appropriate endorsement.
Conclusion: The charge was not quashed. Liberty was left open to the secured creditor or the auction purchaser to make a representation to the Sub-Registrar after the sale for appropriate entry in relation to the SARFAESI sale.