Section 50C applied to leasehold land and building transfers; reopening challenge was remanded for fresh verification.

Section 50C was treated as applicable where the transfer involved leasehold land with a constructed building and the sale deed showed conveyance of land and building, so the leasehold character did not exclude the deeming fiction; this point was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The additional ground challenging reopening under section 147 was remanded because the first appellate authority had not adjudicated it and the assessment records required verification, including possible report from the Assessing Officer. The appeal therefore succeeded only to the limited extent of fresh consideration of the reassessment challenge.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether section 50C of the Income-tax Act applied to the transfer of leasehold land and building. (ii) Whether the additional ground challenging reopening under section 147 required remand for adjudication by the first appellate authority.

Issue (i): Whether section 50C of the Income-tax Act applied to the transfer of leasehold land and building.

Analysis: The transfer was not confined to a bare leasehold right. The asset had been held for business use, a building had been constructed, and the sale deed reflected transfer of land and building. In view of the broader construction of the expression relating to capital assets and the scope of section 50C, leasehold holding did not exclude application of the deeming fiction where land and building were transferred.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether the additional ground challenging reopening under section 147 required remand for adjudication by the first appellate authority.

Analysis: The challenge to reopening raised questions about the completeness of disclosure and the availability of the relevant assessment records. As the first appellate authority had not adjudicated this ground and the record required verification, the matter was sent back for examination of the assessment records and, if necessary, a report from the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: The additional ground was remanded for fresh adjudication.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of remitting the reassessment challenge for fresh consideration, while the substantive challenge to the application of section 50C failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 50C can apply to a transfer of immovable property held on lease where the transaction in substance involves land and building, and a reopening challenge requiring factual verification may be remanded when the first appellate authority has not examined it.

---