Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis of the earlier appellate direction, and the consequential reassessment orders, were valid in law.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the earlier Tribunal decision expunging the appellate direction that had formed the basis for reopening, and on the limitation embedded in section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the Department accepted that the earlier decision on identical facts had attained finality and that no appeal had been filed against it. Following that binding decision, the Tribunal held that the direction to reopen the completed assessment for the earlier year could not survive. Once the foundation for issuance of notice under section 148 disappeared, the notice itself became time-barred and void ab initio, and the reassessment framed on that notice also failed.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice and the reassessment orders were held to be void ab initio, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed. The assessee's cross-objection was allowed.