Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order cancelling GST registration was liable to be set aside for want of reasons and non-compliance with the prescribed procedure under the CGST Rules.
Analysis: Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 requires observance of the prescribed procedure, including issuance of notice, consideration of reply, and passing of a reasoned order in the prescribed form. A cancellation order affecting civil rights must be a speaking order and must disclose application of mind. The impugned order merely recorded that no reply had been filed and that returns were not furnished, without assigning any proper reason or setting out the basis for cancellation. The notice itself also lacked sufficient particulars of the alleged default. Such an order falls short of the statutory requirement and the principles of fair procedure.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was unsustainable and was set aside and quashed. The matter was remitted to the stage of the show-cause notice for fresh consideration in accordance with law.