Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee validly exercised the option under section 115BAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by filing Form 10-IC within the prescribed time so as to exclude computation of tax under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had filed Form 10-IC on 30.11.2022 for assessment year 2022-23 and claimed the concessional regime under section 115BAA. The dispute turned on whether the applicable due date under section 139(1) was 30.11.2022, as claimed by the assessee, or 07.11.2022, as applied by the revenue authorities on the footing that the assessee was not a section 92E case. The Tribunal held that the due date for filing the return could not be altered merely because the assessee had not furnished Form 3CEB earlier or had selected an incorrect audit status in the return. It further held that once the assessee fell within the class of assessees entitled to the later due date, the filing of Form 10-IC on 30.11.2022 was within time, and the benefit of section 115BAA could not be denied on the basis of alleged procedural lapse or clerical error. In that view, computation under section 115JB was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The option under section 115BAA was validly exercised, the MAT computation under section 115JB was not applicable, and the assessee's claim for concessional taxation was accepted.