Partial bogus purchase addition sustained where concurrent factual findings showed purchases were not wholly bogus

Where purchases were supported in part by transportation receipts, octroi receipts and other documents, the Tribunal treated them as partly genuine and confined the addition to 25% of the purchase amount. The High Court found that the concurrent factual findings did not show perversity or any legal error, and therefore no substantial question of law arose for interference in appeal. The restriction of the addition to 25% was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in upholding the restriction of the addition to 25% of the alleged bogus purchase amount and whether any substantial question of law arose.

Analysis: The purchases were found, on the material accepted by the first appellate authority and the Tribunal, to be partly genuine, supported by transportation receipts, octroi receipts and other documents. On that factual basis, the addition was confined to 25% of the purchase amount instead of disallowing the entire claim. The concurrent factual findings that the entire purchase was not bogus did not disclose any perversity or legal error warranting interference in appeal under the substantial question of law standard.

Conclusion: The restriction of the addition to 25% was upheld and no substantial question of law arose.

---