Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of TDS could be denied merely because the return was e-verified belatedly, despite the delay having been condoned and the tax having been duly deducted at source.
Analysis: The return had been filed within time and the TDS amount was admitted to have been deducted. The delay in e-verification was supported by sufficient cause and was subsequently condoned by the CPC. The denial of refund on a purely technical objection was found inconsistent with the principle that tax can be retained only when authorised by law. Refusal to grant the refund in such circumstances was held to amount to unjust enrichment by the Revenue and to offend Article 265 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: Refund could not be denied on the ground of belated e-verification once the delay stood condoned and the tax deduction was undisputed; the assessee was entitled to refund.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax has been lawfully deducted and the delay in verification of the return is condoned, refund cannot be refused on a purely technical ground, as retention of such tax without authority of law violates Article 265 of the Constitution of India.