Pure reimbursement and reasonable transfer pricing method defeat disallowance and invoice-delay adjustment in group transactions.

Pure reimbursements of IT infrastructure and software support, seconded employee salaries, and travel s paid to group entities were treated as cost-to-cost outgoings without any mark-up or profit element, so they were not characterised as fees for technical services and no disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source survived. The transfer pricing adjustment on delayed invoice realisation was also rejected because the six-month USD LIBOR application date adopted by the revenue was not prescribed by the governing arrangement, while the assessee's method was based on a publicly available rate used in good faith. The reimbursements and transfer pricing adjustment were deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reimbursements towards IT infrastructure and software support, salary of seconded employees, and travel expenses paid to group entities were liable to be treated as fees for technical services and disallowed for non-deduction of tax at source. (ii) Whether the transfer pricing adjustment of delayed realization of invoices was justified.

Issue (i): Whether reimbursements towards IT infrastructure and software support, salary of seconded employees, and travel expenses paid to group entities were liable to be treated as fees for technical services and disallowed for non-deduction of tax at source.

Analysis: The payments were found to be cost-to-cost reimbursements without any mark-up or profit element. The IT and software charges related to a common group facility and did not amount to rendition of technical services. The salary reimbursements related to seconded employees who worked under the assessee in routine functions, with tax already deducted on salary income under the salary provisions. The travel expenses were also mere reimbursement of actual outgoings incurred for logistical convenience. On these facts, the amounts did not constitute income in the hands of the recipients and could not be recharacterized as fees for technical services.

Conclusion: The disallowances made on account of IT/software reimbursement, salary reimbursement, and travel reimbursement were deleted, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the transfer pricing adjustment of delayed realization of invoices was justified.

Analysis: The adjustment was made on the basis of the date chosen for applying the six-month USD LIBOR rate. The Tribunal found that the advance pricing arrangement did not prescribe the specific date adopted by the revenue authorities and that the assessee's approach was based on the publicly available rate used in good faith. The adjustment was therefore not considered fair or reasonable.

Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 1,36,723 was set aside and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the additions made in respect of corporate tax reimbursements and transfer pricing adjustment were deleted, while the consequential grounds were left open.

Ratio Decidendi: A pure reimbursement of actual expenditure without profit element does not constitute taxable income or fees for technical services, and a transfer pricing adjustment cannot be sustained where the pricing mechanism is not shown to be contrary to the governing arrangement and the assessee's method is otherwise reasonable.

---