Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained when copies of relied upon documents were not supplied before confirmation of demand, and whether the matter required remand with further opportunity of hearing and cross-examination.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged confirmation of demand on the ground that the noticee had sought copies of the relied upon documents, but those documents were not supplied and the objection was not addressed. The Court held that where a demand is proposed and confirmed on the strength of relied upon documents, the noticee's reply and defence may remain incomplete unless such documents are furnished, and the right to object to the proposed demand may be impaired. In the absence of any satisfactory material from the revenue showing prior supply of the documents, the Court inferred that the petitioner had not been provided those documents before confirmation of demand. The Court also directed that, on remand, the petitioner be given an opportunity to seek other documents, cross-examine witnesses if relied upon, and receive reasons if any request is declined.
Conclusion: The impugned adjudication order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after supplying the relied upon documents and granting due opportunity of hearing.