Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether cancellation of GST registration could be sustained with retrospective effect when the show-cause notice did not propose such retrospective cancellation.
Analysis: The show-cause notice only proposed cancellation of registration and recorded suspension from 05 November 2024, but it did not indicate that cancellation would operate retrospectively from 01 April 2020. The impugned order nonetheless cancelled the registration with retrospective effect. The petitioner also furnished an undertaking to file the pending and regular returns within the stipulated time, and the Court took note of the stated medical difficulties.
Conclusion: The retrospective cancellation was held to travel beyond the show-cause notice and could not be sustained. The order cancelling GST registration was quashed, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The registration cancellation could not stand in its retrospective form, and the petitioner succeeded subject to the undertaking to file the pending returns.
Ratio Decidendi: An adverse administrative order cannot extend beyond the foundation laid in the show-cause notice, and retrospective cancellation of GST registration is unsustainable when it was not put to notice.