TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on alleged non-deduction of tax at source on interest payments, could be sustained by way of rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessment had already been completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The disputed disallowance involved a debatable question requiring detailed enquiry and could not be characterised as a mistake apparent from the record. Such a controversy was beyond the limited scope of rectification jurisdiction under section 154.
Conclusion: The rectification was not sustainable and the disallowance could not be upheld in section 154 proceedings. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
TaxTMI 
