Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether denial of TDS credit and the consequential demand raised under section 143(1) required interference and whether the matter should be remanded for verification of the TDS records.
Analysis: The assessee claimed credit of tax deducted at source reflected in its return, while the lower authorities had restricted credit to the amount appearing in the available TDS records and upheld the balance demand. The Tribunal noted the rival submissions and the paper-book material indicating that the deductor had deducted and deposited the TDS amount and that verification of Form 16A and Form 26AS was necessary for proper determination of the credit claim.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for due verification of the TDS deduction and payment records and for granting appropriate relief in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.