Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether camera modules imported for use in cellular mobile phones were eligible for exemption from Social Welfare Surcharge under Notification No. 11/2018-Cus dated 02.02.2018, and whether the consequent demand of duty, confiscation and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The imported goods were classified under tariff item 85258020, satisfying the first condition in the surcharge exemption entry. However, the exemption also required the goods to answer the description of a "Digital Still Image Video Camera". On the facts found, the camera module was only a part of a mobile phone at the stage of import and lacked the features of an independent digital still image video camera, such as internal storage, output terminal, optical viewfinder or LCD. The exemption notification had to be construed strictly, and the burden lay on the importer to establish full satisfaction of the exemption conditions. The later withdrawal of BCD exemption for camera modules by Notification No. 37/2018-Cus did not establish entitlement under Notification No. 11/2018-Cus.
Conclusion: The importer was not entitled to exemption from Social Welfare Surcharge under Notification No. 11/2018-Cus. The demand was upheld, and the confiscation and penalty were also sustained.