Support Services of Business or Commerce: taxi booking coordination and driver training held outside the taxable definition.

Services limited to receiving customer requests, connecting them with affiliated taxi drivers, and coordinating the booking did not amount to "Support Services of Business or Commerce" under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994. The activity lacked the infrastructural or administrative assistance contemplated by the definition, and direct payment of fare to the driver reinforced that the service was only facilitative. Mere telephonic coordination, driver affiliation, and training were insufficient to bring the activity within the taxable category, so the demand could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the services of connecting taxi drivers with customers through a controlled room and providing related training and coordination fell within "Support Services of Business or Commerce" under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis: The appellant's activity was limited to receiving customer requests, connecting them with affiliated taxi drivers, and facilitating the service, while the fare was paid directly to the driver. The appellant did not operate a call centre or provide the kind of infrastructural or administrative assistance contemplated by the statutory definition. The mere existence of telephonic coordination, driver affiliation, and training did not convert the activity into infrastructural support services or business support services.

Conclusion: The services rendered did not fall under "Support Services of Business or Commerce" under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994, and the demand could not be sustained.

---