Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity of hearing before the first appellate authority on account of invalid service of notices, warranting setting aside of the appellate order and consequential disposal of the quantum and penalty appeals.
Analysis: The appeals arose from additions and disallowances made in the quantum assessment and the consequential penalty under section 270A. The record showed that the assessee had opted out of service of notices through email in Form No. 35 and had specified an alternative address, yet the appellate notices were not served in the manner opted by the assessee for the relevant hearing dates. Although one notice dated 30/07/2025 was received, the matter was thereafter disposed of within a short span. In these circumstances, the assessee was found to have been deprived of an effective and sufficient opportunity to participate in the proceedings before the first appellate authority.
Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The penalty appeal was also set aside to await the result of the quantum appeal. The assessee succeeded.