Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deletion of the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill arising from acquisition of business units was sustainable when the Revenue alleged that the transaction was mischaracterised and the factual basis had not been independently verified by the appellate authority.
Analysis: The assessee's claim of depreciation on goodwill was founded on acquisition of business units on slump sale basis and on the treatment of goodwill as part of the block of intangible assets. The appellate authority accepted the assessee's version and deleted the addition without calling for a remand report or obtaining a factual response from the Assessing Officer, despite the Revenue's objection that the assessment order had proceeded on allegedly incorrect factual assumptions and that the nature of the transaction required verification. In these circumstances, the matter required fresh factual examination at the appellate stage, including consideration of the additional ground concerning the assessment order having been passed in the name of a non-existent entity.
Conclusion: The deletion was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for de novo adjudication after calling for comments from the Assessing Officer and affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing.