Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified when the borrowed funds were claimed to have been fully utilised for advancing a loan and the alleged repayment was in fact salary arrears received from the borrower.
Analysis: The record, including Form 26AS, Form 16 and the ledger account, showed that the sum of Rs. 50,00,000 was received as salary and not as repayment of loan. On that factual basis, the amount borrowed from IDBI Bank was treated as having been utilised for advancing funds to the borrower. Since the factual premise for restricting the deduction by a proportionate disallowance did not survive, no disallowance under section 57(iii) remained justified.
Conclusion: The disallowance of Rs. 7,00,172 was deleted and the assessee was held entitled to full allowance of the interest claim on these facts.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the entire sustained disallowance was set aside on the ground that the interest expenditure was allowable in full.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the evidence establishes that borrowed funds were wholly deployed for the income-yielding purpose and the contrary inference is displaced by reliable documentary material, a proportionate disallowance of interest under section 57(iii) cannot be sustained.