Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of reversal under Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the credit taken on input services used exclusively for dutiable goods could be included in the total CENVAT credit base, and whether the demand, interest and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the computation of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted clearances, particularly sale of electricity. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that, on a conjoint reading of Rule 6(1), Rule 6(2) and Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the relevant base for the formula is confined to common input services and cannot extend to input services used exclusively in the manufacture of dutiable goods. The appellant had reversed credit on the basis of accounts and a Chartered Accountant's certificate, and there was no specific allegation challenging the method of reversal or any short payment.
Conclusion: The demand confirmed by the Revenue was unsustainable. The appropriation of the amount already paid by the appellant was upheld, while the balance demand, interest and penalty were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: For reversal under Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, only common input service credit forms the relevant base, and credit exclusively relatable to dutiable goods cannot be included in the formula.