Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, whose GST registration had been cancelled for non-filing of returns, was entitled to seek restoration of registration on compliance with the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The cancellation was founded on non-submission of returns for a continuous period of six months under Section 29(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The order proceeds on the basis that where the taxpayer furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer may drop the proceedings and pass the prescribed order under Rule 22(4). Applying the same reasoning as in the earlier coordinate bench decision, the Court found that similar relief should be extended, subject to compliance with the prescribed requirements within the time granted.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to approach the concerned authority within 60 days for restoration of GST registration, and upon compliance with the proviso to Rule 22(4), the authority was directed to consider restoration in accordance with law and take expeditious steps for consequential restoration.