Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents should be directed to carry out reassessment of the six bills of entry and whether coercive action should be restrained till such exercise is completed.
Analysis: The petition was founded on alleged inaction in carrying out reassessment of the bills of entry and in issuing challans for the IGST payable. The respondents did not dispute that reassessment could be undertaken in a time-bound manner, while the question of waiver of interest was left to be considered by the authorities at the stage of reassessment. The Court therefore directed reassessment in accordance with the applicable law and restrained coercive action until the exercise was completed.
Conclusion: The respondents were directed to reassess the six bills of entry within eight weeks and no coercive action was to be taken against the petitioner in the meantime.