Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were liable to be set aside for denial of a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST Act and the matter remanded for fresh decision.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the petitioner's authorised representative had been afforded the personal hearing fixed on 11.08.2025. The record showed that the representative attended the office, sought another hearing and recorded that request in the attendance register. The Court found it unnecessary to determine conclusively whether the assessing authority was physically present, because the undisputed position was that a further personal hearing had been requested and was not granted. In these circumstances, the impugned assessments were found to suffer from a breach of the requirement of personal hearing and, consequently, from violation of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were set aside and the matters were remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after granting an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.