Substantial compliance saved concessional tax regime benefit despite delayed Form 10-IC filing where eligibility was undisputed.

Delayed filing of Form 10-IC did not defeat entitlement to the concessional corporate tax regime where the return and computation clearly disclosed the opt-in and the form was available with the processing authority at the time of processing. The delay was treated as a procedural lapse, and the Tribunal applied substantial compliance and beneficial interpretation to hold that a procedural default should not deny a substantive statutory benefit when eligibility itself was undisputed. The denial of the concessional tax rate was set aside, and the assessee was held entitled to computation under the concessional regime.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the concessional tax regime under section 115BAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite delayed filing of Form 10-IC.

Analysis: The return disclosed the assessee's intention to opt for the concessional regime, and the form was available with the processing authority at the time of processing. The delay in filing Form 10-IC was treated as a procedural lapse. Applying the doctrine of substantial compliance and beneficial interpretation, the Tribunal held that a procedural default should not defeat a substantive statutory benefit where eligibility is not in dispute and the opt-in was otherwise from the return and computation.

Conclusion: The denial of the concessional tax rate was set aside and the assessee was held entitled to computation under section 115BAA.

---