Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to concessional countervailing duty under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, and whether the order extending that benefit was sustainable.
Analysis: The levy of additional customs duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is to place imported goods on the same footing as like goods manufactured in India. The binding ruling in SRF Ltd. was treated as final, and it was held that imported goods are to be imagined as manufactured in India for determining entitlement to exemption and concessional duty. The condition of non-availment of CENVAT credit was held not to defeat the exemption in the case of an importer who is not a manufacturer, particularly when no contrary evidence of credit availment was shown and the importer was also constrained by the assessment procedure then in force.
Conclusion: The importer was held entitled to the concessional rate of CVD, and the order allowing the exemption was upheld as lawful.