Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns could be revisited and restoration directed where the registered person undertakes to furnish all pending returns and pay the tax dues, interest and late fee in terms of the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Analysis: Cancellation of registration under Section 29(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on the ground of continuous non-filing of returns carries serious civil consequences. The proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 provides that where the person, instead of merely replying to the show-cause notice, furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass the prescribed order. On the facts, the petitioner had already regularised the defaults and sought the same relief as had been granted in a similar case.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to seek restoration of GST registration, and the concerned authority was required to consider the application in accordance with law upon compliance with the stipulated conditions.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by granting conditional liberty to pursue restoration of the cancelled GST registration and by directing compliance with the arrears and return-filing requirements before the authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Where GST registration is cancelled for non-filing of returns, the proper officer must consider restoration and may drop the proceedings if the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues, interest and late fee as contemplated by the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.