Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, whose GST registration had been cancelled for non-filing of returns, was entitled to seek restoration of registration on furnishing pending returns and making full payment of the tax dues, interest and late fee under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The cancellation was made under Section 29(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for continuous non-filing of returns. The Court followed the settled view that where the registered person is willing to furnish all pending returns and clear the entire tax liability together with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and consider restoration of registration. The Court found the case to be covered by the earlier coordinate bench decision and applied the same relief, subject to compliance with the prescribed requirements within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to approach the concerned authority within 60 days, and upon filing the pending returns and satisfying the requirements under the proviso to Rule 22(4), the authority was directed to consider restoration of GST registration in accordance with law.