Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deletion of addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis that the assessee could determine the fair market value of unquoted shares by adopting a rational valuation method and suitably modifying the net asset value, was justified.
Analysis: The appeal concerned addition on account of share premium received by a closely held company. The Tribunal noted that, in the assessee's own earlier year, it had been held that while fair market value is to be determined under Rule 11UA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the assessee is not barred from substantiating a higher value on a rational basis supported by evidence. The Tribunal also noted that the Delhi High Court had approved the view that the book-value-based approach adopted by the Assessing Officer was not applicable to the relevant assessment year. On the facts, the valuation report and supporting material justified the reworked valuation of the subsidiary and, consequently, the share premium.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition under Section 56(2)(viib) was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.