Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ANZ Support Services India Private Limited could be retained as a comparable for benchmarking the arm's length price of the assessee's learner support and customer care services under the TNMM, particularly in view of the related party transactions filter and functional comparability.
Analysis: The assessee confined its challenge to the inclusion of ANZ as a comparable. The Tribunal noted that the TPO had adopted a related party transactions filter excluding companies where such transactions exceeded 25% of sales, and that the DRP had directed inclusion of ANZ only if it satisfied the functional similarity criteria and the quantitative filters applied by the TPO. On the financial material produced, the Tribunal found that ANZ's related party transactions, on the figures examined, were above the 25% threshold and therefore attracted the very filter applied by the TPO. Since this contention had not been verified by the lower authorities, the Tribunal held that the factual position required examination by the TPO.
Conclusion: The issue of ANZ's inclusion as a comparable was restored for verification, and if the assessee's objection on the related party transactions filter is found correct, ANZ must be excluded from the comparable set.