Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash deposits of Rs. 75,00,000 in the assessee's bank account were rightly treated as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee explained that the deposits represented refunds of earlier advances paid through banking channels for proposed purchase of immovable property, and supported the explanation with bank statements, confirmations, and correlation of advance payments with the refunds received. The documentary trail showed identity of the parties, genuineness of the transactions, and a plausible source for the cash deposits. The Revenue did not bring material to prove the confirmations false, did not disprove the earlier advance payments, and did not conduct meaningful independent enquiry to rebut the explanation. In these circumstances, mere suspicion was held insufficient to sustain the addition.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 75,00,000 under section 69A was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee substantiates cash deposits with contemporaneous banking evidence, confirmations, and a coherent explanation showing refund of earlier advances, the initial burden stands discharged and the onus shifts to the Revenue to rebut the evidence with cogent material before invoking section 69A.