Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to provisional release of seized gold and gold jewellery pending adjudication under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The seized gold and gold jewellery were found to be carried for business purposes and supported by stock records maintained under GST law. The goods were not shown to be imported articles or prohibited goods. The legal position applied was that provisional release should not be refused merely because adjudication is pending or confiscation may later be ordered, since confiscable goods can still be provisionally released on furnishing bond and security. The Tribunal also noted that gold is not prohibited for import and, if ultimately confiscated, redemption fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 would remain available. Reliance on statements recorded during investigation was held insufficient to deny provisional release at this stage.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to provisional release of the seized gold and gold jewellery, subject to bond and bank guarantee conditions.