Extended limitation cannot rest on unproven suppression where a service tax dispute is purely interpretational and audit-driven.

In service tax disputes over job-work under Business Auxiliary Service, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked where the matter arose from an interpretational issue and the allegation of suppression was unsupported by reasoned findings of deliberate non-disclosure. The demand stemmed from a CERA audit objection, was not accepted by the department at the relevant stage, and was kept in the call book. On those facts, the show cause notice was held time-barred, and the demand with consequential penalties could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked in a service tax demand arising from a CERA audit objection and whether the show cause notice was time-barred.

Analysis: The demand arose from an interpretational dispute regarding taxability of job-work activities under Business Auxiliary Service. The records showed that the issue originated from a CERA objection, was not accepted by the department at the relevant stage, and was kept in the call book. In such circumstances, the allegation of suppression of facts was not supported by a meaningful discussion showing deliberate non-disclosure. Limitation was treated as a jurisdictional matter, and a demand issued beyond the normal period could not be sustained in the absence of the ingredients needed to justify the extended period.

Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was not invocable and the show cause notice was time-barred. The demand and consequential penalties could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the threshold issue of limitation, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief followed in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: The extended limitation period cannot be invoked unless suppression of facts is clearly established by reasoned findings of deliberate withholding of material facts; where the dispute is interpretational and stems from a departmental audit objection not accepted by the department itself, the notice is time-barred.

---