Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings and demand raised against the legal representatives of a deceased assessee could be sustained without compliance with the requirement of personal hearing and a reasoned order, and whether the writ petition should be disposed of in terms of the earlier precedent.
Analysis: Section 93 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 recognises liability of the legal representative out of the estate of the deceased where the business is discontinued on death. That liability, however, remains subject to the procedural safeguards in Section 75(4) and Section 75(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which require an opportunity of hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated and obligate the proper officer to set out the relevant facts and basis of the decision. In the present matter, the respondents did not oppose disposal on the same terms as the cited precedent.
Conclusion: The petition was disposed of in terms of the earlier decision, with the challenge to the statutory provisions not pressed and kept open for appropriate proceedings.