Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of cash deposits during the demonetization period, based on rejection of books under section 145(3) and treatment of part of the deposits as unexplained cash credit under section 68, with taxability under section 115BBE, was sustainable.
Analysis: The books and trading results were not shown to suffer from any specific defect in the quantitative details of sales, purchases, stock, or cash balance. The assessee's cash sales and cash availability were supported by the record and corroborated by the VAT returns, while the addition was sustained only on suspicion drawn from the timing of sales and deposits. The absence of direct or substantial evidence to show that the cash was not actually available made the ad hoc estimation and rejection of explanation unsustainable. In these circumstances, the rejection of books and the consequential addition under section 68, together with application of section 115BBE, could not be upheld.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and the relief sought by the assessee was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The assessment-based addition relating to demonetization-period cash deposits stood deleted, and the appeal succeeded in full.
Ratio Decidendi: An ad hoc addition based only on suspicion about the timing of cash sales and deposits cannot be sustained where the books, stock position, and cash availability are not specifically rebutted by direct or substantial evidence.