Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 on account of alleged bogus share sale transactions and accommodation entries was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee had shown the investments in its audited balance sheets, produced sale notes, share bills, bank statements, confirmations, PAN details and income-tax particulars of the purchasers, and demonstrated reduction in investments corresponding to the sale proceeds. The department did not carry out independent verification by issuing notices or summons to the purchasers and relied mainly on Investigation Wing information and general banking patterns. The assessee was not given cross-examination of the persons whose material was relied upon. The documentary evidence, together with the scrutiny assessments of the purchaser entities in later years, was found sufficient to establish identity, creditworthiness and genuineness.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was unsustainable and was rightly deleted. The revenue's challenge failed.