Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after an appellate order setting aside an assessment and directing a fresh assessment after examining specified witnesses, the Income-tax Officer was empowered to treat additional deposits already on record as income of the assessee-firm.
Analysis: Under section 31(3)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, when the Appellate Assistant Commissioner sets aside an assessment and directs a fresh assessment, the Income-tax Officer must comply with the specific directions in the remand order, but subject to those directions he retains the same powers as in the original assessment under section 23 of the Act. The remand in the present case required a fresh assessment after examining the ladies and did not confine the officer merely to a recalculation of figures. The deposits in question were already part of the record, and the second Income-tax Officer was therefore entitled to consider their true character while making the substituted assessment.
Conclusion: The Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to include the other deposits as income of the firm, and the question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: On a general remand for fresh assessment, the Income-tax Officer may re-examine the entire assessment record and make any lawful additions within the scope of the remand directions, unless the appellate order expressly restricts that power.