Limited remand and finality of concluded issues bar reopening beyond the remitted assessment scope under estate duty law.

An express and limited Tribunal remand confined the fresh assessment to the specific issue concerning the 40 cents of land and the mosque under construction, and did not authorise reopening matters that had already attained finality. Matters such as domicile and the foreign liability allowance had been concluded by earlier orders and were not carried in further appeal. Any attempt to reopen those concluded matters would fall within section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and therefore attract the limitation regime under section 73A(b). The respondent also failed to produce the alleged notice said to have been issued within time, so no adverse inference could be drawn against the petitioner on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether the remand order of the Tribunal confined the fresh assessment only to the specific issue relating to the 40 cents of land and mosque under construction, and whether the impugned notice seeking to reopen matters already concluded by earlier orders was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The Tribunal's remand was express and limited to the issue that had arisen in the appeal, and did not authorise reopening of other matters that had already attained finality. Matters such as domicile and the foreign liability allowance had been concluded by earlier orders and were not carried in further appeal. As to those concluded matters, any attempt to reopen would fall under section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, and would therefore attract section 73A(b) of that Act, which prescribes limitation for reassessment. The respondent failed to produce the alleged notice issued within the limitation period, so no adverse inference could be drawn against the petitioner on that basis.

Conclusion: The respondent could proceed only on the issue remanded by the Tribunal, and the impugned notice was barred by limitation insofar as it sought to reopen other concluded matters.

---