Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment years were valid when the recorded reasons did not state failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts, and when the reopening was founded on an incorrect factual premise.
Analysis: The assessments had originally been completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the notices under section 148 were issued after the expiry of four years. In such a situation, the first proviso to section 147 required the reasons recorded to specifically disclose the assessee's failure to make a full and true disclosure of all material facts necessary for assessment. The recorded reasons contained no such assertion. The reasons also proceeded on the incorrect basis that no return had been filed and no scrutiny assessment existed, although both facts were contrary to the record. The defect went to the root of jurisdiction for reopening.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were invalid and were quashed for both years, while the remaining grounds were left open.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the jurisdictional challenge to reopening, and the connected appeals were disposed of as partly allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: For a reopening beyond four years under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the recorded reasons must expressly show failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, and reopening based on an incorrect factual foundation is without valid jurisdiction.