Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the estimate of business income at 30% of cash deposits was justified, or whether income should be computed by applying the presumptive rate under section 44AD.
Analysis: The cash deposits were treated as arising from the assessee's business activities. In that situation, the applicable statutory framework for estimation of profit was section 44AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which contemplates a presumptive profit rate of 8%. The estimate adopted by the lower authority at 30% was found to be excessive in the facts of the case. The assessee's alternative plea regarding peak credit did not survive once the deposits were accepted as business receipts and income was to be estimated on a presumptive basis.
Conclusion: The profit was directed to be computed at 8% of the cash deposits, and the assessee succeeded partly on this issue.