Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 was leviable for non-disclosure of foreign assets in Schedule FA where the omission was claimed to be inadvertent and the related income had otherwise suffered tax.
Analysis: The foreign assets were ESOP shares forming part of employment compensation, with tax having been deducted at source on the perquisite value and the capital gains on sale having been duly offered to tax. The omission was confined to non-reporting in Schedule FA in the inaugural year of the reporting requirement and in the context of a fiduciary holding structure. The penalty provision was treated as discretionary rather than automatic, and the principles that penalty should not be imposed for a mere technical or venial breach, and that absence of deliberate defiance or guilty intent is material, were applied. On the facts, the lapse was held to be bona fide and technical, with no material indicating concealment or tax evasion.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 43 was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted; the assessee succeeded on merits.