Charitable exemption for religious premises denied for commercial shop rentals; demand confined to normal period and penalty removed.

Exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. was confined to services provided by an entity registered under section 12AA and actually engaged in the prescribed charitable activities; mere registration was insufficient. On that basis, letting commercial shops within church premises to private tenants for business use was treated as taxable renting of immovable property, and the exemption for precincts of a religious place meant for general public did not apply. The extended period of limitation was not sustained because the transactions were reflected in the records and the assessee acted under a bona fide belief, so the demand was confined to the normal period and the penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. for rental income from commercial shops situated within the church premises; (ii) Whether the demand could be sustained beyond the normal period and whether penalties were leviable.

Issue (i): Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. for rental income from commercial shops situated within the church premises.

Analysis: The exemption under clause 4 of Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. applies only to services provided by an entity registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by way of charitable activities. Registration alone was held insufficient, as the entity must also be engaged in the specified charitable activities. The appellant's letting of shops for business use was held to be renting of immovable property liable to service tax, and clause 5 relating to renting of precincts of a religious place meant for general public did not cover commercial shops let to private tenants for business purposes.

Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. in respect of the commercial rental income.

Issue (ii): Whether the demand could be sustained beyond the normal period and whether penalties were leviable.

Analysis: The appellant was found to have acted under a bona fide belief and the transactions were reflected in its records. In these circumstances, the extended period was not sustained, and the demand was confined to the normal period. The penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was also set aside.

Conclusion: The demand was upheld only for the normal period and all penalties were set aside.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in part, with the service tax demand restricted to the normal period and the penalties annulled.

Ratio Decidendi: Exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T. is available only where the recipient entity is not merely registered under section 12AA but is actually engaged in the prescribed charitable activities, and commercial letting to private tenants within religious does not fall within the exemption for precincts meant for general public.

---