Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under sections 147 and 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the assessee filed a return in response to notice under section 148 but no notice under section 143(2) was issued.
Analysis: The return filed in response to notice under section 148 was acted upon by the Assessing Officer, but no notice under section 143(2) was issued before completion of assessment. The controlling principle applied was that once a return is filed pursuant to notice under section 148, issuance of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory before framing the assessment, even if the return is treated as belated or the assessee had not filed a return under section 139. Following the binding jurisdictional precedent, the absence of notice under section 143(2) rendered the reassessment unsustainable.
Conclusion: The reassessment was held invalid and void ab initio for want of notice under section 143(2), and the addition sustained in the reassessment was quashed.