Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was time-barred and, if so, whether the reassessment proceedings and consequential assessment were void.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the additional ground challenging the legality of the reassessment. On the dates placed before the Tribunal, the notice under section 148 could have been issued only up to 14.06.2022, but it was actually issued on 30.06.2022. The Tribunal held that the notice was beyond the permissible time limit and therefore invalid. Once the notice itself was barred by limitation, the assumption of jurisdiction failed, and the assessment made pursuant to such notice could not stand in law.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was held to be time-barred, the jurisdictional foundation of the reassessment was held to be illegal, and the consequential assessment order was treated as void. The additional ground succeeded and the appeal was allowed.