Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after constitution and commencement of the GST Appellate Tribunal, the writ petition should be disposed of by permitting the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal route and by protecting the petitioner against limitation objections for a specified period.
Analysis: The Tribunal had been constituted, members had been appointed, and procedural rules for its functioning had been notified. In these circumstances, keeping the writ petition pending served no useful purpose. The petitioner was therefore granted liberty to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal within the specified period, and any pre-deposit already made pursuant to the interim order was directed to be treated as compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement, subject to production of the interim order and proof of deposit. The Tribunal was also directed to call for removal of defects within the stipulated time and the appeal was to be dealt with in accordance with law on merits.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of by granting liberty to avail the statutory appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal with ancillary directions regarding limitation, pre-deposit compliance, and defect removal.